<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="rss.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
<title>RSS Feed</title>
<atom:link href="http://www.ArmyVehicles.com"  />
<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com</link>
<description>Welcome to the ArmyVehicles.com Blog</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<generator>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com</generator>
<copyright>Copyright ArmyVehicles.com, Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:42:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>60</ttl><item>
		<title>Military restricts use of vehicles vulnerable to IEDs</title>
		<description><![CDATA[






Top commanders in Afghanistan have further tightened restrictions on the use of vulnerable vehicles after roadside bomb attacks that have killed eight U.S. soldiers since late May.





The new rules come as attacks from improvised explosive devices (IEDs) have spiked to record levels and insurgents create ever more lethal bombs.





One of those bombs killed five soldiers June 7 when it destroyed their Humvee in eastern Afghanistan.





The Humvee's fatal flaw, a 2008 Pentagon inspector general's report found, is that its &quot;flat bottom, low weight, low ground clearance and aluminum body&quot; leave it vulnerable to IEDs buried in roads. Military officials had known of that weakness since 1994, according to the report.





Full Story &gt;&gt;



]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=208</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=208</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>Army&#39;s new all-terrain vehicle debuts in mountainous Afghanistan</title>
		<description><![CDATA[



BAGRAM, Afghanistan - -- The U.S. military's new all-terrain vehicle doesn't look all that different from its lumbering predecessor. It's painted desert sand, and reaching the cabin still means climbing a couple of steps.


On Afghanistan's rough dirt roads, however, the new $500,000-to-$1 million Mine Resistant Ambush Protected All Terrain Vehicle is a major improvement over the massive Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle it's replacing, soldiers say. The new vehicle is tailored to Afghanistan, and the Pentagon is sending about 5,000 of them to the battlefield.


For soldiers who had grown accustomed to bruising trips through rural Afghanistan, their first M-ATVs, which have just been introduced in the field, were an early Christmas present. Seemingly without effort, the vehicles climb mountains at angles that approach 45 degrees, and they glide across rocky roads.


The M-ATV's lighter frame can maneuver through Afghanistan's lawless traffic much better than the MRAP.

Full story
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=207</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=207</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>The Heavy Equipment Transporter in Iraq</title>
		<description><![CDATA[



CAMP LIBERTY, Iraq &ndash; The Heavy Equipment Transporter slowly and deliberately weaves back and forth between the barriers and cones down the dark and dusty road as its operator gains familiarity and experience with the giant vehicular system that plays a vital role in the U.S. Army's current responsible drawdown of forces in Iraq today. 

The behemoths creak and squeal as they carry large vehicles and heavy loads through the 296th Transportation Company's training lanes. Staff Sgt. Kenneth Hannah of Jacksonville, Florida, is the noncommissioned officer in charge of the HET training lanes.

Full story
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=206</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=206</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>M-ATV not end for MRAP</title>
		<description><![CDATA[




(UPI) Conventional mine-deterrent vehicles deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan should see continued use despite plans for next-generation vehicles, a review says.




The next generation of mine-deterrent vehicles, the mine-resistant, ambush-protected all-terrain vehicles, M-ATV, arrived in Afghanistan just three months after the Pentagon awarded its contract for the vehicle.



U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates told the annual meeting of the Association of the U.S. Army in Washington the M-ATV deployment was an indication that U.S. forces &quot;can deploy rapidly and operate more independently&quot; because of its technological achievements.



A report on Military.com, a U.S. defense forum, says that while the deployment of the M-ATV is in line with the modernization plans for U.S. forces, the military must find uses for the current MRAPs purchased for Iraq and Afghanistan.




Full story.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=205</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=205</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>In the running - Australian built military vehicle</title>
		<description><![CDATA[




Via Where I Live:


AN Australian designed and built personnel carrier/multi-purpose vehicle called the Thales Hawkei is in the running to pick up a Defence Department contract to replace existing and outdated army Land Rovers.




The current machines do not offer adequate protection from land mines and other explosive devices increasingly being used against our forces.




Thales has built a &ldquo;mock-up&rdquo; of the Hawkei in an attempt to persuade Defence Department procurement to look local before placing an order with a US company for 1300 new multi- purpose vehicles.




Hawkei is a protected light mobility vehicle far more advanced than the Land Rover and said to be ahead of its US competition.


Check out full story.


]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=204</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=204</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>Officials Report Progress With JLTV</title>
		<description><![CDATA[




The U.S. Army and Marine Corps&rsquo; long-term solution to their light tactical vehicle needs &mdash; the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle &mdash; is on track to hit all of its milestones, according to program managers who spoke with reporters Oct. 6 at the Association of the U.S. Army convention in Washington.



&ldquo;The trucks are about a third of the way through the 27-month TD [technology development] phase, and we&rsquo;ve been through the preliminary design reviews,&rdquo; says Kevin Fahey, program executive officer, combat support  combat service support. &ldquo;Over the next couple months we&rsquo;re going to do the Critical Design Reviews,&rdquo; with more the first week of October, and two more in November.



Fahey said that between now and the end of the year, the plan is for the three remaining contractors in the competition to submit their armor coupons and ballistics, and early next year in April/ May is when they will get the prototype vehicles with about a year of testing on them.



Check out the full story on AVIATION WEEK.


]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=203</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=203</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>Expo showcases tanks, planes</title>
		<description><![CDATA[
Tanks, helicopters and other military vehicles were out on display at the McEntire Air National Guard Station for the Air and Ground Expo, hosted by the state&rsquo;s National Guard on Oct. 10 and 11.



The public event gave the public an opportunity to see all the hardware that defines our military. Some of the vehicles displayed were used in previous conflicts, such as the Vietnam War and World War II.



&ldquo;This went through Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam and has gone through a few upgrades since 1966,&rdquo; retired Sgt. Maj. Vernie Nance said as he pointed to an AN-IF Cobra Attack Helicopter.


Via The Daily Gamecock.


]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=202</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=202</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>Military monolith: New Fort Bliss vehicles can &#39;drive over anything&#39;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[









FORT BLISS -- They look like monster trucks from -- or for -- hell. 





Their bumpers are dented and have rust forming in the cavities, and there are scratches on the radiator covers. But three Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles, the first of their kind to be assigned to Fort Bliss, received high praise from soldiers who have served in combat zones. 





U.S. companies have been struggling to build the vehicles, called MRAPs, fast enough to meet the demand in Iraq and Afghanistan, where they provide lifesaving protection against roadside bombs. Compared with armored Humvees, they seem nearly indestructible. 





&quot;You can drive an MRAP over anything,&quot; said Spc. Antonio Orozco, who recently returned from Iraq, where he rode in convoys that included the heavily armored vehicles. &quot;I personally have not seen the hull on an MRAP compromised.&quot; 





During his tour, he saw them withstand 500-pound bombs, multiple improvised explosive devices, a roll over and the collapse of a 30-foot-tall concrete tower. 





&quot;I've never seen anything get through it,&quot; Orozco said. 





Orozco also likes the MRAP because of the wide back door, which allows quick pickup of wounded soldiers. 





&quot;If a medical unit is using it, you can put litters in the back,&quot; said Matthew Balsley, who also served a tour of duty in Iraq.





[via El Paso Times]



]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=201</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=201</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>U.S. Army gets demo of new supertoy </title>
		<description><![CDATA[







Oshkosh Defense recently demonstrated the latest in unmanned ground vehicle technology at the U.S. Army Tank Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center at Fort Hood, Texas.



Oshkosh Defense is an industry leader in the development of autonomous vehicle technology. The Oshkosh TerraMax autonomous vehicle system incorporates the latest in advanced robotic hardware and software.



The Oshkosh Command Zone electronics system provides a drive-by-wire capability, which allows intelligent computer control of steering, acceleration, braking, and transmission.



The IBEO LUX laser scanner offers enhanced sensing capabilities as part of the light detection and ranging (LIDAR) system for 360-degree obstacle detection. The laser scanner's low-profile packaging reduces the visual signature of the sensors on the vehicle, allowing the vehicle to blend in more seamlessly within the military's fleets.



The Perception Capabilities Demonstrator technology system is also able to render imagery from a previously driven route alongside real-time data, allowing a human operator to analyze the scene for changes and quickly identify potential threats such as IEDs. Future developments of this emerging technology will focus on improved localization for autonomous operations in varied environments, including areas with little or no GPS coverage.



[via CNET]

]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=200</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=200</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>New Armored Ride Will Protect Troops From IEDs in Afghanistan</title>
		<description><![CDATA[



Most of the damage to American soldiers in Afghanistan is done with Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs). These roadside bombs have proven to be a plague to U.S. and coalition troops, who load into convoys of mine-resistant heavy vehicles, called MRAPs (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected), that were designed to protect troops from blasts. The Pentagon, aided by an influx of Congressional funds, went on an MRAP-buying spree when Humvees in Iraq became targets of choice for insurgents. But the family of MRAPs produced for the Iraq war is not well-suited for Afghanistan. The vehicles' suspensions cannot handle the lack of paved roads. Top-heavy with armor, the vehicles can tip, especially along the steep, winding paths that lead to rural villages.





[via Popular Mechanics]
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=199</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=199</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>Defense chief Gates cuts Army combat vehicles from budget</title>
		<description><![CDATA[
Defense Secretary Robert Gates has submitted a defense budget that scraps Army plans for new combat vehicles &mdash; after spending almost $14 billion in research and development costs &mdash; because they won't adequately protect troops from roadside bombs.





Gates also raised questions about the Marines' new amphibious landing craft because, saying it's unclear how often U.S. forces will need to storm beaches. The Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) already has cost at least $1.2 billion in research and development.








Gates' action follows his push to accelerate delivery of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles (MRAPs) to Iraq to replace Humvees after generals and members of Congress complained the Humvees provided inadequate protection from bombs planted by insurgents.








Source



]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=198</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=198</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>Gates eyes quick relaunch of US Army-vehicle revamp</title>
		<description><![CDATA[
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Thursday he hoped to relaunch a major modernization of U.S. Army ground vehicles as early as 2011 after scrapping the current $87 billion effort to allow lessons from Iraq and Afghanistan to be factored in.





In good news for Boeing Co (BA.N), SAIC (SAI.N) and other contractors involved in the program, Gates said the Pentagon's fiscal 2010 budget request would seek &quot;substantial money&quot; to develop a revamped vehicle plan for Future Combat Systems, the Army's flagship modernization drive.





Source






]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=197</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=197</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>Army Robots: Will Humans Still Be in Control?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[






Is the day approaching when the U.S. military can deploy a robot that can drive itself around a corner, use senors to detect an enemy fighter on the move and destroy targets instantly with missiles and machine guns &mdash; all without human intervention? The Pentagon thinks the day may be imminent, and it wants to ensure that its technology doesn't get ahead of military doctrine. It wants to be certain that there is always a human making decisions regarding the use of lethal force.





Source



]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=196</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=196</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>U.S. tanks going to Iraqi army</title>
		<description><![CDATA[
&quot;In a turnaround from previous policy, the Iraqi army will acquire 140 advanced American-made battle tanks with help from the U.S. military over the next 18 months.





The deal, announced this week by U.S. military officials in Iraq, was called a &quot;major step in the force modernization of [the Iraqi army&rsquo;s] armored units.&quot;





The M1A1SA Abrams tanks are expected to be acquired by the Iraqis in groups of 35 over the next 18 months. Officials with the Multi-National Security Transition Command in Iraq did not answer questions about whether the Iraqis paid for the tanks under the Foreign Military Sales program or they were donated by the U.S. military. &quot;





Source






]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=195</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=195</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>Oshkosh receives $477 million Army vehicle order</title>
		<description><![CDATA[
Oshkosh Corp. said Wednesday it has received a $477 million order from the Army for more than 1,350 new and rebuilt trucks and more than 1,000 armor-ready trailers.





With the latest order for Oshkosh's defense division, the value for the Oshkosh, Wis.-based company's heavy tactical vehicles III contract has increased to more than $2.1 billion, the company said.





Source



]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=194</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=194</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>Probe: Marine Corps officials abandoned urgent 2005 request for MRAPs </title>
		<description><![CDATA[









Stars and Stripes reports:





ARLINGTON, Va. &mdash; The Defense Department Inspector General has found that Marine Corps officials abandoned an urgent 2005 request for MRAP vehicles to protect Marines in Iraq.





Officials had determined that the commandant&rsquo;s decision in June 2005 to field up-armored Humvees to Iraq meant the vehicles were &quot;the immediately available solution to the IED threat,&quot; according to the report, obtained Tuesday by Stars and Stripes.





&quot;As a result, in August 2005, the [Marine CorpsCombat Development Command] stopped processing the February 17, 2005, MRAP [Urgent Universal Need Statement], even though the M1114 up-armored HMMWV did not adequately protect Marines from under-body IED attacks, which were increasing in Iraq,&quot; the report said.





At the time, most roadside bombs used against Marine tracked and wheeled vehicles exploded to the side of the vehicles, but in summer 2006, insurgents started detonating more roadside bombs beneath vehicles, the report said.





Gen. Michael Hagee, the Corps commandant in 2005, opted to field up-armored Humvees in response to a commander&rsquo;s request for a &quot;capability to increase survivability and mobility of Marines operating in a hazardous fire area against known threats,&quot; said Marine Corps spokesman Col. David Lapan.





&quot;The decision to pursue M1114 was made consciously by the Marine Corps leadership because of its proven capability to protect, its tactical utility, the demand by the Marines in theater, and its availability,&quot; Lapan said in a Tuesday e-mail.





The IG report came in response to allegations by Franz Gayl, a Marine Corps civilian who claimed in an internal report published by The Associated Press earlier this year that the 2005 request for MRAP vehicles withered and died in the Corps&rsquo; &quot;Byzantine&quot; procurement system.





Gayl, who still works for the Marine Corps, alleged that the officials reviewing the request lacked technical knowledge on the matter and were afraid that fielding MRAPs would take funding away for other programs.





&quot;Senior retired Marines, as permanent personnel, often have disproportionate, budget-centric influence over the UUNS vetting process,&quot; Gayl wrote in his report. &quot;When viewed from a bureaucratic perspective, the MRAP UUNS would have had unfavorable reprogramming implications for MCCDC&rsquo;s programmatic focus.&quot;





But the report found that officials stopped working on the request for MRAPs as an unintended consequence of Hagee&rsquo;s decision to field up-armored Humvees.





&quot;Apparently, the Commandant of the Marine Corps&rsquo; decision to acquire up-armored HMMWVs at the same time as the UUNS for MRAP-type vehicles was being processed deterred MCCDC from completing the UUNS process as required, even though the then-Commandant [later told investigators] that he did not intend for this to happen,&quot; the report said. 





Gayl also claimed that the delay in fielding MRAP vehicles to Marines in Iraq costs hundreds of lives, but the inspector general&rsquo;s report did not find any officials involved with reviewing the request criminally negligent.





Eugene Fidell, president of the National Institute of Military Justice, said that it is inevitable that procurement matters will be &quot;misprioritized&quot; in an institution as complex as the Defense Department.





If each of those incidents turned into a prosecution for dereliction, &quot;the court-martial system would be flooded,&quot; he said.





But the report criticized the Defense Department for not doing more to develop MRAP-type vehicles before the Iraq war, despite knowing the danger mines and roadside bombs posed to Humvees.





Source



]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=193</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=193</guid>
		</item><item>
		<title>Welcome to ArmyVehicles.com Beta!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[

We are pleased to have launched a beta version of the ArmyVehicles.com site for feedback. Please forward us comments via email to webmaster@armyvehicles.com 





During the Beta launch, we welcome all suggestions and comments to help improve the website. If you encounter any issues, please let us know.



]]></description>
		<link>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=192</link>
		<guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.ArmyVehicles.com/blog/index.php?entryid=192</guid>
		</item></channel></rss>